Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 F.2d 987 - Hill v. Nicodemus

Hill v. Nicodemus’s Empirical Analysis

979 F.2d 987 · 1992

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss. (1994), Young v. City of Mount Ranier (2001)

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

1601992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Bell v. Wolfish · City of Canton v. Harris · Ingraham v. Wright · City of Revere v. Massachusetts General Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o establish that a particular condition or restriction of his confinement is constitutionally impermissible “punishment,” the pretrial detainee must show either that it was (1) imposed with an expressed intent to punish or (2) not reasonably related to a legitimate non-punitive governmental objective, in which case an intent to punish may be inferred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘Pretrial detainees, like inmates under active sentence, are entitled to medical attention, and prison officials violate detainee’s rights to due process when they are deliberately indifferent to serious medical needs.' ” Id. at 991 (quoting Gordon v. Kidd, 971 F.2d at 1094 ). 2 . The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that Brown had violated his probation and should be returned to state custody. And, if Brown was a pretrial detainee rather than a convicted prisoner, then the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, rather than the Eighth Amendment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.