Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 FSUPP2D 320 - Smith v. Phillips

Smith v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Corbitt v. New Jersey · Lafler v. Cooper · Coles v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); Smith v. Phillips, 865 F.Supp.2d 271 (E.D.N.Y.2012) (“Smith II”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.