In Re Quiat’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on 161 Ill. 2d 459 - In Re Chandler · La Plata Medical Center Associates, Ltd. v. United Bank of Durango · Elk River Associates v. Huskin · Quiat v. Berger (In Re Vann) · People v. Reynolds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“negligent in determining whether the representation of a client may be materially affected by the lawyer's own interests, or whether the representation will adversely affect another client, and causes injury or potential injury to a client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Cimino“[sluspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer knows of a conflict of interest and does not fully disclose to a client the possible effect of that conflict, and causes injury or potential injury to a client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Cimino“Quiat's failure to appreciate and understand the wrongfulness of his conduct mandate a longer suspension.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Cohen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.