Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 SO2D 1 - Finn v. State

Finn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Enmons · 539 So. 2d 1375 - McClendon v. State · 717 So. 2d 314 - Watts v. State · 879 So. 2d 512 - Alexander v. State · 936 So. 2d 481 - King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unlawful for any person to purchase, possess, transfer or distribute two hundred fifty (250) dosage units or fifteen (15) grams in weight (dosage unit and weight as defined in Section 41-29-139) of pseudoephedrine or ephedrine, knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that the pseudoephedrine or ephedrine will be used to unlawfully manufacture a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “unlawful to purchase, possess, transfer or distribute two hundred fifty (250) dosage units or fifteen (15) grams in weight (dosage unit and weight as defined in Section 41-29-139) of pseudoephedrine or ephedrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “WHETHER MISSISSIPPI CODE ANNOTATED SECTION 41-29-313(2)(C)(I) CRIMINALIZES THE POSSESSION OF GREATER THAN FIFTEEN GRAMS IN WEIGHT OF PSEUDOEPHEDRINE WHEN THE DRUG IS IN DOSAGE FORM.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.