Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 SO2D 1093 - State v. Lebron

State v. Lebron’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gregg v. Georgia · Rhode Island v. Innis · Oregon v. Elstad · Marks v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, `the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds . . .'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a suspect who has once responded to unwarned yet uncoercive questioning is not thereby disabled from waiving his rights and confessing after he has been given the requisite Miranda warnings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]he admissibility of post warning statements should continue to be governed by the principles of Elstad unless the deliberate two-step strategy was employed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.