Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 SO2D 1129 - Lenoir v. Jones

Lenoir v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Connelly v. CROWN CRUISE LINE, INC. · Alvarez v. US SEC. Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant correctly argues that the trial court had no authority to dismiss the instant case without giving him an opportunity to be heard and to present any evidence he might have regarding the reasons he did not serve the defendants within the required time frame. Based on Rule 1.070(i)[ 1 ] and fundamental requirements of due process, the trial court erred in dismissing Plaintiffs case without giving him an opportunity to show good cause why service was not made within the required time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.