Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 So. 2d 182 - Bowles v. State

979 So. 2d 182 - Bowles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Crawford v. Washington · Ring v. Arizona · Knight v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “probably not working with what we would say is an intact brain”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Trial counsel will not be held to be deficient when she makes a reasonable strategic decision to not present mental mitigation testimony during the penalty phase because it could open the door to other damaging testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that Bowles told him that 'it bothers him [that] he killed six people who probably didn't deserve to die.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.