Latiolais v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “no longer considered filed by this office.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Brown v. Patient Comp. Fund Oversight Bd. · 991 So. 2d 58 - In Re Medical Review Panel Proc. of Ouder

2. “The trial court erred in granting mandamus in this case ordering the defendants to reconstitute Latiolais's January 21, 2004 petition and nullifying the PCF's declaration that the January 21, 2004 petition is considered as not filed or without effect. The PCF did not overstep its authority in this case as it did in Golden . Latiolais was not prevented from continuing the process, and in fact did proceed to assert his claim. The PCF accepted the filing of his April 27, 2004 petition and sent out the notice letter to all parties just as it had with the January 21, 2004 petition. Therefore, there is no basis for the trial court's judgment.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Brown v. Patient Comp. Fund Oversight Bd. · 991 So. 2d 58 - In Re Medical Review Panel Proc. of Ouder

3. “pertaining to the suspension of prescription which occurs during the pendency of the review panel process. With that interpretation, it is not the [PCF's] place to assert prescription and effectively dismiss plaintiff's claim with prejudice. The defendant alone may choose to assert prescription.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Brown v. Patient Comp. Fund Oversight Bd.