Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 SW2D 326 - Coffey v. State

Coffey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Ex Parte Madding (2002), Taylor v. State (2004)

49 state decisions

330199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ablon v. State · Eubanks v. State · Rodarte v. State · Aguilar v. State · Mazloum v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is the pronouncement of sentence that is the appealable event, and the written sentence or order simply memorializes it and should comport therewith.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that part of the judgment ... that orders that the punishment be carried into execution in the manner prescribed by law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sentence shall be pronounced in the defendant's presence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.