Letson v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Walling v. Metcalfe · State v. Morales · Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corp. · Millwrights Local Union No. 2484 v. Rust Engineering Co. · Miller Paper Co. v. Roberts Paper Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an appeal of a temporary injunction is not a vehicle which imbues the court with jurisdiction to address interlocutory matters outside the scope of section 51.014 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.” Letson v. Barnes, 979 S.W.2d 414, 417 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1998, pet. denied). When a litigant challenges both appealable and unap-pealable interlocutory orders, we”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Waite v. Waite“[s]imply put, if the court has no authority to act, it can hardly be said that the court's action is valid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.