Ex Parte Cooks’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Scott · Lockhart v. Nelson · Bauder v. State · Ex Parte Bauder · Ex Parte Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he crucial difference between repros-ecution after appeal by the defendant and reprosecution after a sua sponte judicial mistrial declaration is that in the first situation the defendant has not been deprived of his option to go to the first jury and, perhaps, end the dispute then and there with an acquittal. On the other hand, where the judge ... aborts the proceeding, the defendant has been deprived of his “valued right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Legrand
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.