Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 SW2D 98 - Barnett v. Commonwealth

Barnett v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · Gall v. Commonwealth · Gall v. Kentucky · Partin v. Commonwealth · Gross v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Each Commonwealth’s attorney and county attorney may enter into agreements to share or redistribute prosecu-torial duties in the Circuit and District Courts. Any prosecutorial or related duty assigned by statute to the Commonwealth’s attorney may be performed by the county attorney, and any prose-cutorial or related duty assigned by statute to the county attorney may be performed by the Commonwealth’s attorney pursuant to these agreements. Copies of the agreements shall when executed be forwarded to the Attorney General, the chief judges of the Circuit and District Courts, and the chief regional judges of the Circuit and District Courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the probative worth of the evidence, the probability that the evidence will cause undue prejudice, and whether the harmful effects substantially outweigh the probative worth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.