Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 AD 101 - Riglander v. Star Co.

Riglander v. Star Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2010

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

40190419101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Howard v. . Moot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The court or justice must designate a day certain, during that term, on which day the said cause shall then be heard; if there be two or more causes so designated for trial for the same day, the said causes shall be heard in the order of their date of issue.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.