State v. Saenz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “* * * the defense of entrapment does not arise where one is ready to commit the offense given but the opportunity, * * *.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rabon · State v. Reyes

2. ““We note that the same narcotics agent, Officer Madrid, on cross examination in State v. Ybarra, 97 Ariz. 200 , 398 P.2d 905 used language which tended to link the defendant to a different crime from that charged. We found this insufficient in that case to constitute reversible error because no objection or motion to strike was made. However, it is noteworthy that this veteran officer, by continuing to testify to matters which could be properly subject to objection as inadmissible and highly prejudicial, has failed to heed the admonition given in Kellington. Such conduct, if persisted in, may well result in reversible error where none would otherwise exist.” State v. Saenz, supra, 98 Ariz. at 184—185, 403 P.2d at 282 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brewer