State v. Mangrum’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
74 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently October 1983 · most notably State v. Rose (1978), State v. Acosta (1966)
74 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Little · State v. Gortarez · State v. Harris · State v. Schumacher · State of Arizona v. Pollock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . would it be admissible for some purpose other than the mere contradiction, or would the evidence of the fact stated in prior inconsistent statements be admissible.” State v. Mangrum, supra, 98 Ariz. at 286 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction the evidence must be viewed in light most favorable to the state, and all reasonable inferences must be resolved against defendant. In considering whether a verdict is contrary to the evidence we do not decide whether we would reach the same conclusion as the jury. The question is whether there is competent evidence to support the conclusions found. * * * ” [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tafoya
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.