Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Ark. App. 39 - Eaton v. State

98 Ark. App. 39 - Eaton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. State · Byrd v. State · 73 Ark. App. 123 - Pack v. State · 61 Ark. App. 36 - Springston v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because intent can rarely be proven by direct evidence, the fact-finder is allowed to draw upon its common knowledge and experience to infer intent from the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.