Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 CALAPP2D 124 - People v. Wochnick

People v. Wochnick’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
10
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably 37 Cal. 3d 351 - People v. McDonald (1984), 31 Cal. 3d 18 - People v. Shirley (1982)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 75 state decisions — followed in 10 states

400195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frye v. United States · State v. Lowry · 85 Cal. App. 2d 686 - People v. Houser · State v. Cole · People v. Forte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think the systolic blood pressure deception test has not yet gained such standing and scientific recognition among physiological and psychological authorities as would justify the courts in admitting expert testimony deduced from the discovery, development, and experiments thus far made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.