Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 CALAPP2D 709 - People v. DeWitt

People v. DeWitt’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
January 1971
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1971

14 state decisions

60195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Farrington · 40 Cal. App. 2d 102 - People v. Hightower · People v. Woon Tuck Wo · People v. Moore · 73 Cal. App. 2d 629 - People v. BRAC

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well established in this state that the admissibility of evidence given in the nature of an experiment lies within the sound discretion of the trial, court so long as substantially the same conditions obtain in the experiment as existed in the original act. And there is no abuse of discretion where it reasonably appears that the evidence tends to aid rather than to confuse the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.