Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Conn. App. 608 - State v. Davis

98 Conn. App. 608 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Soberon v. United States · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Henderson v. Brown · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Attwood v. Singletary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[cjommunications between client and attorney are privileged when made in confidence for the purpose of seeking legal advice____A communication from attorney to client solely regarding a matter of fact would not ordinarily be privileged, unless it were shown to be inextricably linked to the giving of legal advice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the defendant's right to a fair trial was not prejudiced by the trial court's consolidation for trial of three separate informations against the defendant?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may fairly be inferred to have been influenced by the criminal act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.