Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.1d 913 - King v. Watkins

King v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

98 F. 913 · 1899

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1959
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on White v. Luning · Reusens v. Lawson · New York and Texas Land Co. v. Thomson · Clarkston v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co. · King v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of admitting ancient documents in evidence, without proof of their genuineness, is based on the ground that they prove themselves, the witness being presumed to be dead. The doctrine goes no further than this. The questions of its relevancy and admissibility as evidence cannot be affected by the fact that it is an ancient document. It is no more admissible on that ground than if it were a newly executed instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.