¶1Whit Y. Mauzy, U. S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okl.
¶2R. A. Barney, of Pawhuska, Okl. for appellees.
¶3Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
¶5Appeal, 19 F.Supp. 616, dismissed on motion of appellant.
98 F.2d 1023
Docket No. 1774.
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided Sept. 7, 1938.
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1938-09-07
2 counsel of record
Relies on United States v. Carson
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1938-09-07
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1977
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Whit Y. Mauzy, U. S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okl.
¶2R. A. Barney, of Pawhuska, Okl. for appellees.
¶3Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
¶5Appeal, 19 F.Supp. 616, dismissed on motion of appellant.