Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.2d 298 - Lee v. Mitcham

Lee v. Mitcham’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.2d 298 · 1938

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2001

8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

4019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mutual Life Ins Co of New York v. Hillmon · Union Pac Ry Co v. Chicago R I P Ry Co Union Pac Ry Co · Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. · Ketchum v. Duncan · Dodge et al. v. Freedman's Savings and Trust Company

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.