Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.2d 559 - In re Prudence Co.

In re Prudence Co.’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.2d 559 · 1938

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently November 1988 · most notably West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co. (1971), Anaconda-Ericsson Inc. v. Hessen (1985)

26 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

130193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Riggi Bros. · Pullman Couch Co. v. Eshelman · In re Westover, Inc. · Petition of Stuart · Bonded Mortgage Co. of Baltimore v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the approval of a compromise is a discretionary order which can be reversed only upon a clear showing of an abuse of discretion,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.