Deutsch v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.2d 686 · 1938
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2007 · most notably Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc (1984), Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H. L. Green Co. (1963)
19 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nutt v. National Institute Incorporated for the Improvement of Memory · National Institute, Inc. v. Nutt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Books, including composite and cyclopedic works, directories, gazetteers, and other compilations; “(b) Periodicals, including newspapers; :i(c) Lectures, sermons, addresses (prepared for oral delivery); “(d) Dramatic or dramatico-musieal compositions; “(e) Musical compositions; “(f) Maps; “(g) Works of art; models or designs for works of art; “(h) Reproductions of a work of art; “(i) Drawings or plastic works of a scientific or technical character; “(j) Photographs; “(k) Prints and pictorial illustrations including prints or labels used for articles of merchandise; “(l) Motion-picture photoplays; “(m) Motion pictures other than pho-toplays. “The above specifications shall not be held to limit the subject matter of copyright as defined in section 4 of this title, nor shall any error in classification invalidate or impair the copyright protection secured under this title.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.