Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.2d 79 - United States v. Sullivan

United States v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.2d 79 · 1938

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
June 2014
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably United States v. Stoehr (1952), Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United States (1947)

23 federal appellate · 4 district ·

170193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 145

Relies on Tynan v. United States · United States v. Commerford · Emmich v. United States · United States v. Miro · United States v. McCormick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the attempt to evade the tax for a given year is a separate offense from an attempt to evade the tax for a different year; they are clearly crimes ‘of the same class.’ Moreover, the evidence of intent to evade the tax in one year is competent evidence of intent to evade the tax in a later year. * * Indeed, the crimes charged in the indictment describe one course of conduct extending over several years, which results in separate offenses simply because the duty to file a return and pay the tax is one that recurs every twelve months. Under these circumstances we think it very clear that joinder of the charges was proper.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.