Wallace v. Hudson-Duncan & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.2d 985 · 1938
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2014
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 601 · 7 U.S.C. § 608C (Food and Agriculture Act of 1965)
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Houston East West Texas Railway Company v. United States · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · Noble State Bank v. Haskell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Either (1) must sell or hold all the walnuts it acquires in the state of acquisition ; “Or (2) export from the state not more than a percentage of its intended shipments determined [percentage] by the Secretary for each ‘crop year’, * * * upon the consideration of the delivery of the remainder of such intended export to a control Board. “The Board may sell the walnuts it received to purchasers abroad or to shelters within the United States, at prices fixed by the Board, or may eliminate all or part of them from the market by donation or sale to charitable institutions in the United States, with provisions that such sales or donations shall not enter the channels of trade in the United States as unshelled walnuts. “The Board also has the power to release to interstate shipment through the contributing packers all or portions of the surplus delivered to it, if, in its opinion, the proper control of the interstate market warrants it. The proceeds of the disposition of the surplus and payments of credit value by the shippers are to be ratably apportioned and distributed to them by the Board; “Or (3) may export from the state all of its intended interstate shipments upon the consideration of a payment to the Board, not of what the packer has sold them for, but of a certain ‘credit value’, fixed for all shippers by the Board, of the surplus walnuts which would otherwise have been delivered to the Board.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““(D) Determining, or providing methods for determining, the existence and extent of the surplus of any such commodity or product, or of any grade, size, or quality thereof, and providing for the control and disposition of such surplus, and for equalizing the burden of such surplus elimination or control among the producers and handlers thereof. (E) Establishing or providing for the establishment of reserve pools of any such commodity or product, or of any grade, size, or quality thereof, and providing for the equitable distribution of the net return derived from the sale thereof among the persons beneficially interested therein.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.