United States v. Scroger’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.3d 1256 · 1996
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Cortez v. McCauley (2007), United States v. Diaz (2001)
38 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Kotteakos v. United States · Payton v. New York · Bailey v. United States · United States v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant can be convicted as an aider and abettor even though he was indicted as a principal for commission of the underlying offense and not as an aider and abettor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is not an independent crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is a ‘basic principle of Fourth Amendment laV that searches and seizures inside a home without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable.” Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586 , 100 S.Ct. 1371, 1380 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980). Therefore, absent consent or exigent circumstances, police may not enter a citizen’s residence without a warrant. Id. at 590 , 100 S.Ct. at 1382 .... “[T]here is no absolute test for the presence of exigent circumstances because such a determination depends on the unique facts of each controversy.” [United States v.] Wicks, 995 F.2d [964] at 970 [ (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993) ] (internal quotations omitted) ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Glisson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.