Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 2 - Olkey v. Hyperion 1999 Term Trust, Inc.

Olkey v. Hyperion 1999 Term Trust, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.3d 2 · 1996

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Lawrence Marcus Marc Kasky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. At&t Corp., Jeffrey A. Moss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Donna Borok Moss v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company (1998), Boddie v. Schnieder (1997)

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

6501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Papasan v. Allain · United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] prospectus will violate federal securities laws if it does not disclose ‘material objective factual matters,’ or buries those matters beneath other information, or treats them cavalierly.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The only way reasonable investors would then invest in the Trusts would be if they believed that the probability of rates rising exceeded the probability of interest rates dropping.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “exactly the risk the plaintiffs claim was not disclosed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.