Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 22 - Duamutef v. O'Keefe

Duamutef v. O'Keefe’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.3d 22 · 1996

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
January 2010
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2010

8 federal appellate ·

130199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Safley · Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Brower v. United States · Alaska v. Babbitt · Graven Auction Co. v. Fink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requiring [compliance] with the PLRA fee provisions at this point would not further the congressional purposes of reducing the state's burden of defending frivolous actions. Nor would it have any effect on deterring future frivolous litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Inmates shall not lead, organize, participate, or urge other inmates to participate, in work-stoppages, sit-ins, lock-ins, or other actions which may be detrimental to the order of the facility,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.