United States v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.3d 258 · 1996
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Knox (2002), United States v. Grimes (1999)
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · United States v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As there is no current or prospective prosecution of [the defendant] for perjury, the violation of Rule 11 ... was harmless____If the violation of the rule weren’t harmless, because there was a prospect of a perjury trial, still the proper sanction would be exclusion of the statement from that trial rather than throwing out the guilty plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.