United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.3d 330 · 1996
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States v. Ervasti (2000), United States v. Serrano-Lopez (2004)
45 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 175 (Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989)
Relies on United States v. Lopez · Richardson v. Marsh · Zafiro v. United States · Doerr v. Doerr · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the evidence rationally supports two conflicting hypotheses, the reviewing court will not disturb the conviction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a guilty verdict, we look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and accept as established all reasonable inferences supporting the verdict.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'The evidence need not exclude every reasonable hypothesis except guilt.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.