Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 343 - St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Missouri United School Insurance Council

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Missouri United School Insurance Council’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.3d 343 · 1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Brown v. Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance (2002), Home Insurance v. Aetna Insurance (2001)

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Langley v. Allstate Insurance Company · West v. Jacobs · Continental Casualty Co. v. Maxwell · Katz Drug Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. · GRE Insurance Group v. Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`accept the written policy as the expression of the agreement made by the parties, and give effect to the intentions of the parties as disclosed by clear and unambiguous language.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]hen federal courts are exercising diversity jurisdiction, the rules for construing insurance policies are controlled by state law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]hether the language of an insurance contract is ambiguous is a question of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.