Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 463 - Gates

Gates’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2014

2 district · 1 state decisions

50199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Safley · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail · United States v. Armour & Co. · International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`in some respects contractual in nature,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “and were sanctioned $10,000 per day for every day they were not in compliance. The court appointed the mediator to be a special master. The district court stayed the monetary sanctions so long as the prison officials complied with the special master's directives for implementation of the modified outpatient plan by the deadlines to be set by the special master. The special master was to report any failures by the prison officials to do what he said, when he said, and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “psychiatric care, is that the prison, and the state budget for the prison, remain under the continuing and largely unfettered supervision of the district court and its magistrate judge, mediator, special master, and experts, instead of the state political process and appointed prison administrators. 47 The vagueness of the psychiatric care standard is in striking contrast to other parts of the consent decree. For example, the decree requires the prison officials to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.