Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 619 - United States v. Morrison

United States v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.3d 619 · 1996

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
December 2023
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 44 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Gaviria (1997), United States v. White (1997)

29 federal appellate · 44 district ·

5301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1505 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 856 (§ 416 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bailey v. United States · Jones v. Barnes · Blackledge v. Allison · MacHibroda v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he motion and the files and records of the case”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A 'district judge's decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing before denying a § 2255 motion is generally respected as a sound exercise of discretion when the judge denying the § 2255 motion also presided over the trial in which the petitioner claims to have been prejudiced.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is well settled that the test for prejudice under Brady and Strickland is the same.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). 5 . Baxter also contends that the district court abused its discretion in failing to grant an evidentiary hearing to develop his Brady claim. A”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.