Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 659 - Larou v. Ridlon

Larou v. Ridlon’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.3d 659 · 1996

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
December 2022
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 64 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Noviello v. City of Boston (2005), Santa Padilla-Garcia v. Jose Guillermo Rodriguez Municipality of Mayaguez (2000)

37 federal appellate · 64 district ·

6501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Branti v. Finkel · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he burden then shifts to the defendant official to articulate a nondiscriminatory basis for the adverse employment action, and prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the adverse action would have been taken regardless of any discriminatory political motivation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'unsupported and speculative assertions regarding political discrimination'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “1) [T]ake something of consequence from an employee, by discharging or demoting her, reducing her salary, or divesting her of significant responsibilities; or 2) withhold from an employee an accoutrement of the employment relationship, by failing to follow a customary practice of considering her for promotion after a particular period of service.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.