Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F.3d 849 - Sherwinski v. Peterson

Sherwinski v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

98 F.3d 849 · 1996

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Henry v. Lake Charles American Press, L.L.C. (2009), Martinez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (2002)

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. · Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court will give effect to a State's waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity only where stated by the most express language or by such overwhelming implication from the text as [will] leave no room for any other reasonable construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`[u]ntil the factual and legal basis of the case has been further developed, no defendants will be dismissed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.