Barichello v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.3d 948 · 1996
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably The San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco (1998), International College Of Surgeons v. City Of Chicago (1996)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Younger v. Harris · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Bell v. Wolfish · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“come to mean that absent unusual circumstances, a federal court must refrain from entertaining injunctive relief which might interfere with the officers or judicial process of state courts and administrative agencies when important state interests are involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Indiana v. Haws“(1) the judicial or judicial in nature state proceedings must be on-going; (2) the state proceedings must implicate important state interests; and (3) there must be an adequate opportunity in the state court proceeding to raise constitutional challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When confronted with circumstances that clearly implicate Younger concerns, a federal court must abstain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.