Uniroyal Technology Corporation Royalite Division v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
98 F.3d 993 · 1996
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 728, Intervenor (1998), Multi-Ad Services Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board (2001)
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · New Jersey v. New York · Gregory v. United States · Reavis v. Antinore · In re Vey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the results of a Board-supervised and certified election are presumptively valid,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Substantial evidence is `such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support the conclusion of the Board.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.