Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Fla. 118 - Chace v. Johnson

Chace v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Pembroke v. Caudill (1948), Dodson v. National Title Insurance Co. (1947)

6 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

1201929193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Rawlins · Southern Menhaden Co. v. How · Ullendorff v. Graham · Johnston Realty & Investment Co. v. National City Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The provision in the contract under consideration relating to the liquidated damages does not specify what sum shall be so regarded in the event of a breach of its terms by the vendee but provides for an increasing penalty in inverse ratio to the purchaser’s performance of the contract’s terms. The less he performs the less he forfeits, but the nearer he comes to a complete fulfillment of the agreements, on his part to be performed without completing them the greater sum he forfeits to the vendor. “The clause we think merely secured to the vendor an option to rescind the agreement and take what damage he actually sustained or waive the privilege and bring action upon the unqualified agreement of the purchaser to pay.” (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““that the clause of the contract quoted above provided the only remedy available to the seller in a ease of a failure on the purchaser’s part to meet any of the deferred payments or to comply with any of the other covenants upon his part to be performed; that by such clause the parties had provided for liquidated damages to be recovered by the seller, in the event the purchaser should fail to perform the covenants of payment under the contract; and that the seller had no other recourse.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.