Dunkle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1981
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Danford v. State · Irene Cuebas Arredondo v. Felipe Cuebas Y Arredondo · R. R. Ricou & Sons Co. v. Merwin · Wynegar v. State · Rast v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The latter clause of section 7244, supra, reads as follows: “and if any person borrows or hires property aforesaid and embezzles or fraudulently converts it or its proceeds, or any part thereof, to his own use, he shall be punished as if he had been convicted of larceny.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brock v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.