Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

98 F.R.D. 305

Hamar v. Hyatt Corp.

Nevada District Court

Decided June 7, 1983

Nevada District Court · decided 1983-06-07

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“It has been the policy of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to enforce the requirements of NRS § 18.130 in diversity actions.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 647 F. Supp. 1148 - Arrambide v. St. Mary's Hospital, Inc.

Applies NV 18 § 18.130

Relies on 99 F. Supp. 964 - Keller Research Corp. v. Roquerre · Port Construction Co. v. Virgin Islands Housing Authority · Ilro Productions, Ltd. v. Music Fair Enterprises, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-06-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2017

3 district ·

201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.

¶1The defendant has served and filed a demand for security for costs and charges which may be awarded against the plaintiff. The plaintiff has responded that the defendant failed to attach points and authorities as required in a United States district court.

¶2Points and authorities are required in support of motions by Local Rule 16. However, a demand pursuant to NRS 18.130 is here involved, rather than a motion. Therefore, the absence of points and authorities is not erroneous.

¶3It has been the policy of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to enforce the requirements of NRS 18.130 in diversity actions. This is also the general practice elsewhere. See Ilro Pro*306ductions, Ltd. v. Music Fair Enterprises, 94 F.R.D. 76 (S.D.N.Y.1982); Keller Research Corp. v. Roquerre, 99 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.Cal.1951); Port Construction Company v. Virgin Islands Housing Authority, 284 F.Supp. 774 (D.V.I.1968).

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff comply with the requirements of NRS 18.130.

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice that security is required shall be deemed to have been served on the plaintiff as of the date of this minute order.

/98/frd/305 · .json · Public domain