Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 FSUPP 941 - In Re Ouellette

In Re Ouellette’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2004
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2004

2 district ·

10195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stern v. Paper · Biggs v. Mays · In re Mays

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Fair value” is not the valuation that would prevail at a sheriffs sale, sacrifice, or forced sale, nor is it the value to one person or another specially circumstanced. “Fair value” means such a price as a capable and intelligent business man could presently obtain for the property from a ready and willing buyer accustomed to buying such property. Such a value will depend upon many circumstances, such as age and condition of the stock, the state of trade, location of the business, the existence' of a lease, and many other things. See Stern v. Paper, D.C. 1910, 183 F. 228 . No one factor alone is conclusive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.