United States v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3584 · 18 U.S.C. § 3585
Relies on Koon v. United States · Francisco Rios v. Ron Wiley Ron Wiley · United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez · United States v. Montez-Gaviria · United States v. Brannan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court does not believe that the [1995] revisions in any way affect the primary holdings of [ Rios and Brannan ], which permit adjustment of a sentence under 5G1.3 to reflect time served for which no credit is received....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ruggiano v. Reish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.