Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 F. Supp. 2d 665 - Nice v. Centennial Area School District

98 F. Supp. 2d 665 - Nice v. Centennial Area School District’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2071 (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · De Sylva v. Ballentine · General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation 94-1064 94-1194 94-1195 94-1198 94-1202 94-1203 94-1207 94-1208 94-1219 · LaRocca Estate · Dacanay v. Mendoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... nothing in 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983-1988 supplies the rule of decision by which a minor's compromise of a civil rights claim should be reviewed by the court. Nor does the manner by which the settlement is approved implicate a federal interest or show a need for national uniformity. In contrast, under our federal system, matters of con-cem to the family unit, including the well-being of minors, traditionally have been of utmost interest to the individual states, [citations omitted]. Because of this interest, state law is usually well-defined and developed in this area. Accordingly, the court holds that, under [Eastern District of Pennsylvania] Local Rule 41.2, in a federal civil rights action, it is appropriate to apply the rule of decision prescribed by state law in determining the fairness of a minor’s compromise and the reasonableness of any attorneys’ fees allocated from that settlement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The court has an inherent duty to protect the interests of minors and incompetents who appear before it. As part of that duty, the court must determine the fairness of any settlement agreement ... in a suit brought on behalf of a minor or incompetent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.