98 F. Supp. 2d 849 - Morales v. Coyle’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment of conviction bars a convicted defendant who was represented by counsel from raising and litigating in any proceeding' except an appeal from that judgment any defense or any claimed lack of due process that was raised or could have been raised by the defendant at the trial, which resulted in that judgment of conviction, or on an appeal from that judgment.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 419 F. Supp. 2d 976 - Martin v. Wilson · 301 F. Supp. 2d 698 - Bonnell v. Mitchel

2. “adequate and independent” state ground on which the State can foreclose federal review; and (4) if the above are met, whether the petitioner has demonstrated cause and prejudice, or a fundamental miscarriage of justice. Id. In determining whether a state court rested its holding on procedural default so as to bar federal habeas review, the Court must look to”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 301 F. Supp. 2d 698 - Bonnell v. Mitchel · 482 F. Supp. 2d 919 - Montgomery v. Bagley

3. “Where a defendant has procedurally defaulted a claim by failing to raise it on direct review, the claim may be raised in habeas only if the defendant can first demonstrate either "cause” and actual "prejudice,” ... or that he is "actually innocent.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 301 F. Supp. 2d 698 - Bonnell v. Mitchel · 482 F. Supp. 2d 919 - Montgomery v. Bagley