98 F. Supp. 2d 9 - Kilpatrick v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
17 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Delaware State College v. Ricks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“employment decision does not rise to the level of an actionable adverse action . .. unless there is a `tangible change in the duties or working conditions constituting a material employment disadvantage.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.