State v. Mara’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2021
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duren v. Missouri · Pele Defense Fund v. Paty · State v. Richie · United States v. Doyle · Gomila v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prosecutorial misconduct warrants a new trial or the setting aside of a guilty verdict only where the actions of the prosecutor have caused prejudice to the defendant's right to a fair trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“abuses its discretion when it clearly exceeds the bounds of reason or disregards rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Labatad“Mara had not shown that the witness sought was available and willing to testify or that the denial of a continuance would materially prejudice Mara.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. CANENCIA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.