State v. Shabazz’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2022
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Olmstead v. United States · McCleskey v. Kemp · Rose v. Mitchell · United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co. · Tachibana v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it matters little where and when in the trial improper prosecutorial appeals to race prejudice occur. While such remarks in closing arguments may be fresher and more memorable to a deliberating jury, those made in opening statements can be an infusion that imbrues and imbues the entire course.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. David“"Compulsion” means absence of consent, or a threat, express or implied, that places a person in fear of public humiliation, property damage, or financial loss.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Ancheta“references to race that do not have an objectively legitimate purpose constitute a particularly egregious form of prosecutorial conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. David
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.