Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 Ill. 2d 502 - People v. Yates

98 Ill. 2d 502 - People v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

231
cited by 231 later decisions
3
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 214 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 231 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably 209 Ill. 2d 194 - People v. Evans (2004), 145 Ill. 2d 353 - People v. Illgen (1991)

4 federal appellate · 214 state decisions

121019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Mapp v. Ohio · Payton v. New York · Lockett v. Ohio · Swain v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 231 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The guiding principle is reasonableness, and each case is evaluated based upon the totality of the circumstances known to the officers at the time of the warrantless entry.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “And I want to make it clear, the defendant is not charged with rape. And we are not saying he was able to consummate an act of rape, but what we are saying is that it is possible that during this course of time the defendant decided to satisfy some other sort of need, some other desire. That would explain why Veronica Lee was found naked in the closet, when she was first [sic] seen by her mother in a rose colored gown. That would explain the fact that there are scratches on the arms of the defendant. Did he take off his clothes and then wake the girl up? Did she surprise him? We really don’t know. (Petition, p. 9).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““It is, of course, as we have repeatedly recognized, the jury’s responsibility to resolve factual disputes, assess the credibility of the witnesses, and determine the weight and sufficiency of the evidence [citation], and its judgment will not be reversed unless the evidence is so unsatisfactory or improbable that a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of defendant remains.” People v. Yates (1983), 98 Ill. 2d 502, 518-19 , 456 N.E.2d 1396 , cert, denied (1984), 466 U.S. 981 , 80 L. Ed. 2d 836 , 104 S. Ct. 2364 , rehearing denied (1984), 467 U.S. 1268 , 82 L. Ed. 2d 864 , 104 S. Ct. 3563 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.