Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 98 KAN 261 - Bromich v. Burkholder

Bromich v. Burkholder’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1980

8 state decisions

5019161920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Binkley v. Forkner · Tifft v. . Horton · Ford v. . Cobb · Campbell v. Roddy · Eaves v. Estes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence of the plaintiff in the present case tended to show that the boiler in question can be removed without substantial injury to the real estate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.